Email Address for Sean Donahue Town of Reading Massachusetts
BREAKING – Three studies published past the CDC, Britain Government & Oxford University find the Covid-19 Vaccines practice non piece of work
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an Md caste from the John Hopkins University School of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and dissentious act because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent infection or manual of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published a newspaper on September ninth analysing various studies that were published in Baronial 2021 which show the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant is evading the current Covid-19 injections on offer and therefore do non foreclose infection or transmission of Covid-nineteen.
The Doctor of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
- Protect the vaccinated person against the illness
- Keep vaccinated people from conveying the infection and transmitting it to others.
However, the Doctor of Medicine writes that herd immunity will not be reached through vaccination because new research in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta variant produces very loftier viral loads which are just equally loftier in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, co-ordinate to Nina Pierpont (Dr., PhD), vaccine mandates; such as the one now enforced in the Uk for all Care Habitation staff, have no justification because vaccinating individuals does non finish or even slow the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.
Which leads the Doctor of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination considering all severities of Covid-nineteen disease produce healthy levels of natural amnesty.
Ix Pierpont (MD, PhD) cites three studies whose findings and data support her conclusions and these include a study published Baronial 6th 2021 in the Centre for Disease Control's (CDC) 'Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Written report', another study published August 10th 2021 by Oxford University, and a final report published Baronial 24th 2021 which was funded by the UK Section for Wellness and Social Care.
CDC Study
The CDC study focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two calendar week menstruum. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with alleged Covid-nineteen symptoms, and 1.2% being hospitalised.
However the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with but 1 person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The written report likewise establish that viral loads were found to be very similar amidst the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were as infectious.
Oxford University Written report
The Oxford University report examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and April 2021. The entire hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 still, the first case amongst the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 infirmary staff were so retested for the Covid-19 virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the hospital into lockdown. Over the next ii weeks, 16 boosted cases were identified.
The study found that 76% of the Covid-nineteen positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with iii staff members developing pneumonia and ane staff member requiring three days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads amongst the fully vaccinated infected group were found to be 251 times college than height viral loads plant among the staff in March – April 2020 when they were not vaccinated.
UK Department of Wellness & Social Care Study
The Great britain Department of Health & Social Intendance study is an analysis of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the Great britain and includes measures of viral load amid the population.
The report establish that viral loads amongst the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are nearly the same, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-xix injection scroll-out. The study too establish that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the study conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection take lost efficacy against what they claim to exist the Delta Covid-nineteen variant, but they maintain that they are substantially constructive at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to 80%.
Nine Pierpont (MD, PhD) rightly asks in her newspaper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the study were fully vaccinated people.
The Medico of Medicine writes –
'If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected by 2-thirds (67%), we would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to exist less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say we commencement with 1000 people in the country, of whom nosotros will randomly sample 100. The country is 80% vaccinated. This ways that in our sample of 100 we have 80 vaccinated and twenty unvaccinated people.
Let'south say that the virus has infected 10% of the people across the sampling catamenia, or 10 total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and 2 in the unvaccinated (80% and 20% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has made no divergence in whether one tin can get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated grouping would be reduced past 2/three to two.67 cases, and the total cases would be only four.67 cases (2.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).
This means that only 2.67/4.67 or 57% of the cases would exist in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We can go back to x% overall being positive just using ratios, yielding 5.7 cases among the vaccinated and 4.three amongst the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the full population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated past the authors.
Information technology appears to me—as in the Massachusetts study—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere betwixt slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The Great britain study is articulate that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'
The in a higher place three studies lead Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) to conclude in her newspaper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging deed.
She writes that since the master reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they do not do this, those who mandate the Covid-xix injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting impairment to those whom they pressure into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, education or society.
Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
0 Response to "Email Address for Sean Donahue Town of Reading Massachusetts"
Post a Comment